Could Other Nations Pursue Australia's in Banning Social Media for Teenagers Under 16?
The nation's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.
European Movement
Across Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering similar measures.
- The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation may be passed next year.
- The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
- Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the tools under consideration".
- In The Spanish government, the president has urged parliament to pass a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
- In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
- The government in The Dutch government has advised families to block their children from social media until 15.
For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.
"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," stated one parliamentarian behind the initiative.
Britain: A Cautious Approach
For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong research".
Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the issue.
Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who was lost after encountering dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.
"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and fit for young users," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.
The United States: A Fragmented Picture
Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level due to country-wide stalemate.
- Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
- Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
- The state of Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
- The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted bills mandating guardian approval for teenagers to create social media presences.
Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.
Worldwide Outlook
Beyond the West, other countries are similarly exploring options.
- The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
- The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.
But, global organizations take a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.
Even as this global conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers indicate that governments around the world are less and less willing to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.