🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.